Leaderboard - Challenge 2 - Trial Event 3
Teams
The following teams participated in Trial 3.
Team Name | Lead Affiliation | Team Lead | Members | ||||||
ARPA-e Benchmark | Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) | Carleton Coffrin | |||||||
CasePower | Case Western Reserve University | Vira Chankong | Hanieh Agharazi | Kenneth A Loparo | Kamlesh Mathur | Pitjaya Tangtatswas | Fan Zhang | ||
Electric Stampede | University of Colorado Boulder | Kyri Baker | Constance Crozier | Javad Mohammadi | |||||
GERS USA | GERS USA | Juan Manuel Gers | Camilo Acosta | David Alvarez | Garzon Caceres | Sergio Rivera | Diego Rodriguez | Andrés Zapata | |
GMI-GO | Georgia Institute of Technology | Andy Sun | Santanu Dey | Amin Gholami | Kaizhao Sun | Shixuan Zhang | |||
GO-SNIP | Lehigh University | Frank Curtis | Daniel Molzahn | Andreas Waechter | Ermin Wei | Elizabeth Wong | |||
Gordian Knot | Virginia Tech | Vassilis Kekatos | Mohammadhafez Bazrafshan | Sarthak Gupta | |||||
GOT-BSI-OPF | Global Optimal Technology, Inc. | Gilburt Chiang | Hsiao-Dong Chiang | Bin Wang | Simon Wyatt | Dr. Lin Zeng | |||
GravityX | individual | Hassan Hijazi | |||||||
M&H Grid Solutions | M&H Grid Solutions | Yong Fu | Lin Gong | Jinjie Zheng | |||||
magos | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) | Ignacio Aravena-Solis | Nai-Yuan Chiang | Quentin Lété | Shmuel Oren | ||||
Monday Mornings | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) | Miguel Heleno | Alexandre Moreira da Silva | Alan Valenzuela Meza | |||||
NU_Columbia_Artelys | Artelys | Richard Waltz | Daniel Bienstock | Jorge Nocedal | |||||
Pearl Street Technologies | Pearl Street Technologies | Marko Jereminov | Neeraj Bedmutha | David Bromberg | Larry Pileggi | Athanasios Terzakis | Hui Zheng | ||
SUGAR-CMU | Carnegie Mellon University | Aayushya Agarwal | Timothy McNamara | Amritanshu Pandey |
Scoring
Scoring according to the Scoring document, summarized as
For each scenario s, a prior point solution is constructed by keeping all variables fixed to their values in the prior operating point in the base case and the contingencies, projecting first the base case and then the contingencies to ensure feasibility of all hard constraints (details in the formulation document). Let MSpps denote the market surplus of the prior point solution for scenario s. This value is computed independently from the solutions provided by competitors.
For any entrant, the solution to scenario s is evaluated and a market surplus MStotals is assigned. If no solution is returned, or the solution is incorrectly formatted, or the solution is determined to be infeasible, or the evaluated market surplus is less than MSpps, then the assigned market surplus is MSpps.
The score MSgains, representing the gain in market surplus relative to the prior point, is computed as
MSgains = MStotals - MSpps
The score over a given set S of scenarios is
MSgain = ∑i∊S MSgains
Competitors were given a chance to review results before they were posted. See the Results Certification Period information.
Rankings
Ensemble is the set of best scores for a Division.
MSgain for all 66 Trial 3 scenarios | |||||||
Division 1 | Division 2 | Division 3 | Division 4 | ||||
Ensemble | 207,215,328 | Ensemble | 210,524,387 | Ensemble | 206,581,708 | Ensemble | 210,300,837 |
Electric Stampede | 190,564,664 | NU_Columbia_Artelys | 208,251,869 | Electric Stampede | 190,565,648 | NU_Columbia_Artelys | 207,721,687 |
GravityX | 171,474,568 | GravityX | 190,594,154 | NU_Columbia_Artelys | 171,497,551 | GravityX | 186,997,477 |
NU_Columbia_Artelys | 169,919,107 | GMI-GO | 170,851,464 | Pearl Street Technologies | 161,876,057 | GMI-GO | 170,848,944 |
Pearl Street Technologies | 161,876,057 | Electric Stampede | 167,721,694 | Gordian Knot | 147,298,696 | Electric Stampede | 167,210,475 |
Gordian Knot | 146,323,898 | Pearl Street Technologies | 161,876,057 | GravityX | 143,962,648 | Pearl Street Technologies | 161,876,057 |
GOT-BSI-OPF | 107,881,004 | magos | 161,253,968 | GOT-BSI-OPF | 107,881,004 | magos | 161,253,968 |
GMI-GO | 99,578,006 | ARPA-e Benchmark | 146,356,600 | GMI-GO | 99,593,494 | ARPA-e Benchmark | 146,340,636 |
magos | 72,760,192 | GOT-BSI-OPF | 108,837,590 | magos | 72,760,192 | Monday Mornings | 115,001,830 |
ARPA-e Benchmark | 49,947,791 | Gordian Knot | 108,414,227 | Monday Mornings | 47,645,573 | GOT-BSI-OPF | 108,837,590 |
Monday Mornings | 42,000,595 | Monday Mornings | 105,517,759 | ARPA-e Benchmark | 47,329,390 | SUGAR-CMU | 103,781,578 |
SUGAR-CMU | 32,697,483 | SUGAR-CMU | 103,993,746 | SUGAR-CMU | 32,664,818 | Gordian Knot | 102,942,572 |
GERS USA | 24,048,950 | GERS USA | 22,746,121 | GERS USA | 23,414,842 | GERS USA | 25,354,657 |
CasePower | 0 | CasePower | 0 | CasePower | 0 | CasePower | 0 |
GO-SNIP | 0 | GO-SNIP | 0 | GO-SNIP | 0 | GO-SNIP | 0 |
M&H Grid Solutions | 0 | M&H Grid Solutions | 0 | M&H Grid Solutions | 0 | M&H Grid Solutions | 0 |
Additional information is available.